Of note, most of these tools are mostly based on classifiers designed to assign a phosphorylation site to a particular protein kinase considering only the sequence pattern surrounding the phosphorylation site, which provides an imperfect description of the kinase–substrate specificity. The list of currently developed tools for KSRs prediction is shown in Table 1. These approaches must overcome several challenges including the complexity of the regulatory networks itself, and the scarce information available about the molecular mechanisms that ensure recognition between protein kinases and substrates. This complex scenario has opened an important field for the development of computational strategies for phosphorylation site labeling with the specific protein kinase(s) responsible for its modifications in a whole proteome scale, in an effort to reconstruct the underlying regulatory networks. This is largely due to the expensive and time-consuming methodologies that need to be used in the identification of kinase–substrate relationships (KSRs). PhosphoSitePlus database collects large part of the information obtained in these studies, including the localization of 144,899 serines, 61,654 threonines, and 41,273 phosphorylated tyrosines, but only 12,180 (5%) of them have annotated the protein kinase responsible for such modifications. The identification of phosphorylated sites (or phosphosites) has experienced an explosion with the utilization of mass spectrometry techniques. Protein phosphorylation is also the most widespread post-translational modification, affecting at least three-quarters of the proteome. The transient nature of this modification (reversed by dephosphorylation reactions, catalyzed by protein phosphatases) generates the main molecular switch, regulating each aspect of protein function, including interactions, conformations, subcellular localization, enzymatic activity, and turnover. These enzymes catalyze the transference of γ-phosphate moiety from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to the hydroxyl group of serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues present in substrate proteins. Protein kinases is the second largest family of enzymes, composed by 518 members in the human genome. An accurate modeling of kinase–substrate relationships could be the greatest contribution of bioinformatics to understand physiological cell signaling and its pathological impairment. Only recently, the development of phosphorylation predictors has begun to incorporate these variables, significantly improving specificity of these methods. However, in the intracellular environment the protein kinase specificity is influenced by contextual factors, such as protein–protein interactions, substrates co-expression patterns, and subcellular localization. The vast majority of predictors is based on the linear primary sequence pattern that surrounds phosphorylation sites. The greatest difficulty for these approaches is to model the complex nature that determines kinase–substrate specificity. To fill this gap, many computational algorithms have been developed, which are capable to predict kinase–substrate relationships. Although it is still largely unknown, the protein kinases are responsible for such modifications. Using mass spectrometry techniques, a profound knowledge has been achieved in the localization of phosphorylated residues at proteomic scale. Protein phosphorylation, catalyzed by protein kinases, is the main posttranslational modification in eukaryotes, regulating essential aspects of cellular function.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |